Introduction to Management

Organizational Management

“Management is about making plans and implements them effectively.”

“Management is a process of getting activities completed effectively and efficiently with and through other people.”

“Management is doing things efficiently and effectively.”

Efficiency:
Efficiency is to get maximum output from minimum input.
OR
It is to get maximum profit from minimum resources.

Effectively:
Effectiveness means goal attainment and doing right things at the right time.

  • Minimum resource utilization
  • Vital part of management
  • Goal/Objects Attainment and goals should be achievable.
  • Management should be efficient as well as effective.
  • A person can be efficient without being effective. He may get the things done with minimum sources but as far objective isn’t met it’s not effective.

Need / Importance of Management

Good Management is required for:

  • Optimum utilization of resources (Cost competitiveness)
  • Motivates personnel (Effectively utilize human resource)
  • Facilitates innovation (Explore opportunities)
  • Improve Efficiency (get the things fast or efficiently and effectively)
  • Competitive Advantage (Survive and win over competitors)

Hallmarks of Scientific Research

Main characteristics which will distinguish scientific research from common research.

1. Purposiveness

“Research should have a definite aim or purpose.”

2. Rigor

”A good theoratical base and sound methodological design give rigor to the research. Rigor indicates carefulness and degree of exactitude in research.”

3. Testability

”Scientific research lend itself to testing logically developed hypothesis to see whether or not data support the educated conjecture or hypothesis.”

4. Replicability

”The results of the test of hypothesis should be supported again and again when same type of research is conducted in other similar circumstances.”

5. Precision and Confidence

”Precision refers to the closeness of the findings to reality based on a sample. Precision reflects the degree of exactness and accuracy of the results on the basis of samples. Also known as confidence interval in statistics.
Confidence refers to the probability that our estimation are correct so that we can confidently claim that 95% of the time our results will be true and there is only 5% chance of our results being false.”

6. Objectivity

”The conclusion drawn through the interpretation of the results of data analysis should be objective that is, they should be based on facts of the findings derived from actual data and not on our own subjective or emotional values.”

7. Generalizability

”It refers to the scope of replicability of the research findings in one organizational settings to others, the wider the range of replicability of the solution generated by the research the more useful the research is to the user.”

8. Parsimony

”Simplicity in explaining the phenomenon or problem that occur in generating the solutions of the problem is preferred as compared to complex research frame work.

 

Edit ( EXAMPLES )

Since many visitor of this blog requested for examples of Scientific Research, here are few of them:

  1. How excessive use of Mobile Phone will affect Teenager’s muscular development?
  2. What Economical effects can CPEC have on Pakistan’s GDP Growth in Year 2017?
  3.  Why property values have risen to sky-high in Lahore over a period of 5 years?

Note: These are mere examples of how a research topic can be, however every teacher does have their own opinion about purpose of research hence might not accept these as answers at all.

Business Research Methods

Business Research:
“It is defined as an organized, systematic, critical, data based, objective, scientific inquire or investigation into a specific problem undertaken to find an answer.

Types of Research

There are three perspective research can be divided in.

1. Application

a. Applied Research:
“Research done with the intention of applying the results of the findings to solve specific problems currently being experienced in the organization is called applied research.”

b. Basic Research:
“Research done to enhance the understanding of certain problems that commonly occur in organizational settings and seek methods of solving them.”

2. Objective

a. Deceptive:
“A study classified to describe systematically a problem, situation or a phenomena.”

b. Correlational:
“Main emphases is to discover or establish the existence of relationship or interdependence between the two or more aspects of a situation.”

c. Explanatory:
“It attempts to clarify why and how there is a relationship between the two aspects of a situation.”

d. Exploratory:
“It is conducted with the objective either to explore an area where little is known or to investigate the possibilities of understanding a particular research study.”

3. Inquiry

a. Quantitative:
“It is a structured approach in which every thing that forms the research process that are objectives, design and structure questionnaire for the survey is pre-determined.”

b. Qualitative:
“An un-structured approach allows the flexibility in all the aspects of research process.

Evolution of Marketing

Evolution of Marketing “OR” Marketing Orientation

In subcontinent, marketing was introduced in 18th century with the British colonies.

The following are the concepts about the marketing orientation.

Production Orientation:

The production concept prevailed from the time of the industrial revolution until the early 1920’s. The production concept was the idea that a firm should focus on those products that it could produce most efficiently and that the creation of a supply of low-cost products would in and of itself creates the demand for the products. The key questions that a firm would ask before producing a product were:

Can we produce the product?

Can we produce enough of it?

At the time, the production concept worked fairly well because the goods that were produced were largely those of basic necessity and there was a relatively high level of unfulfilled demand. Virtually everything that could be produced was sold easily by a sales team whose job it was simply to execute transactions at a price determined by the cost of production. The production concept prevailed into the late 1920’s.

The Production Concept has been around for years. That concept simply suggests that customers

prefer inexpensive products that are readily available. In effect, “if we make it, they will come.”

Product Orientation:

The Product Concept suggests that companies that build the “better mousetrap” will gain

favor. The thinking here is that customers want products that have higher quality, that offer better performance or do something unique.

Sales Orientation:

By the early 1930’s however, mass production had become commonplace, competition had increased, and there was little unfulfilled demand. Around this time, firms began to practice the sales concept (or selling concept), under which companies not only would produce the products, but also would try to convince customers to buy them through advertising and personal selling. Before producing a product, the key questions were:

Can we sell the product?

Can we charge enough for it?

The sales concept paid little attention to whether the product actually was needed; the goal simply was to beat the competition to the sale with little regard to customer satisfaction. Marketing was a function that was performed after the product was developed and produced, and many people came to associate marketing with hard selling. Even today, many people use the word “marketing” when they really mean sales.

The Marketing Concept:

After World War II, the variety of products increased and hard selling no longer could be relied upon to generate sales. With increased discretionary income, customers could afford to be selective and buy only those products that precisely met their changing needs, and these needs were not immediately obvious.

The key questions became:

What do customers want?

Can we develop it while they still want it?

How can we keep our customers satisfied?

In response to these discerning customers, firms began to adopt the marketing concept, which involves:

– Focusing on customer needs before developing the product

– Aligning all functions of the company to focus on those needs

– Realizing a profit by successfully satisfying customer needs over the long-term

When firms first began to adopt the marketing concept, they typically set up separate marketing departments whose objective it was to satisfy customer needs. Often these departments were sales departments with expanded responsibilities. While this expanded sales department structure can be found in some companies today, many firms have structured themselves into marketing organizations having a company-wide customer focus. Since the entire organization exists to satisfy customer needs, nobody can neglect a customer issue by declaring it a “marketing problem” – everybody must be concerned with customer satisfaction.

The marketing concept relies upon marketing research to define market segments, their size, and their needs. To satisfy those needs, the marketing team makes decisions about the controllable parameters of the marketing mix.

Societal Marketing:

The societal marketing concept can be defined as the organizations task which tries to identify the needs and interests of the consumers and delivers quality services or products as compared to its competitors and in a way that consumer’s and society’s well being is maintained. In other words organizations have to balance consumer satisfaction, company profits and long term welfare of society.

This is a new marketing philosophy and tries to reduce the inequalities at various levels. This theory emphasizes that organizations should not only think of cut-throat policies to achieve targets and jump ahead of competitors but should have ethical and environmental policies and then back them up with action and regulation.

Mega Marketing:

Management activity that involves (in addition to the typical marketing activities) other elements of a firm’s external environment such as government, media, and pressure groups is Mega marketing. The term was coined by the US marketing academic Philip Kotler who suggests that a market mix must have two more P’s: public-relations, and power.

Concepts of Marketing

Core Concepts of Marketing

Need:
Need is a state of self deprivation or neediness.

Wants:
The objects that will satisfy the need are wants.

Demand:
When wants are supported by the buying power of the customer its demand.

Marketing Offers:
Marketing offers are all the objects (products and services) which have the capacity to fulfill the requirements of customers’ needs, wants and demand.

Channel of Intermediaries:
All those parties or individuals who transfer the finished goods from producer to the consumers are channel of intermediaries.

Wholesaler: Deals in the bulk quantities.
Distributor: Distribute the products to end users.
Retailer: Sell the product in small quantities to the final consumers.
Agent: Provides services on behalf of the producer or manufacturer.

Transaction:
Exchange of desired object with something in return is transaction. A transaction is made when a) Parties are agreed upon b) Time and place is specific c) some benefit should be transferred.

Expectations:
What benefits the customer is expecting from the product, and when the product’s value will match will the expectation of the customer then it’s up to their expectation.

Quality:
The want satisfying ability of a product is the quality of that product.

Value:
Difference between cost of obtaining any product and the benefit the customer is taking from that product is the value. If cost is less than benefit then it’s valuable and if the product’s perceived performance match with the customer’s expectation then it’s up to the mark.
– If the performance of the product is equal to the expectation of the customer then customer will be satisfied.
– If performance is greater than the expectation then customer will be delighted.
And if the performance will be less than the expectation then customer will be dissatisfied.

Managerial Decision Making

Managerial Decision Making


“Decision making is a process of developing a commitment to some course of action.”

Characteristics of Decision Making

1. Element of Risk:
Decision making is always charged with Risk. The probability of success is always less than 100. The decisions are either major or minor the risk is there.

2. Uncertainty:
The decision making process is uncertain. You never know what will be the outcome. The final result is totally unpredictable.

3. Lack of Structure:
Decision making process is implemented on the newly faced problems which haven’t already been solved. These are mostly non-routine problems and the solution process is un-structured that means there aren’t specified rules or procedures to follow.

4. Conflict:
Whenever a decision is going to be made there will be an opposing party so conflicts may arise. That could be a pressure group or employees or anything. The conflict may arise within our self too.

Decision Making Process

1. Identify the problem:
The first step in decision making is to identify the problem, what actually the problem is? Whether there is some discrepancy.

2. Generate Alternatives:
The second step is to generate alternatives. Look for the possible solutions of the problem, talk to relevant people, call meetings, collect the required information and get the ideas from other people whether they are feasible or not. The ideas should be creative and originative.

3. Evaluation of Alternatives:
Now list all the possible alternatives and evaluate them. Which are feasible and practically implement able? Also look for the resources needs to implement those ideas. Then finally list the best possible ones.

4. Make a Choice:
After evaluating, get the best possible solutions with you and then give them another look to choose the best of the best. The solution with few negatives and less cost with high returns will be selected.

5. Implementation:
Now the selected solution will be implemented practically and resources will be allocated to do the job.

6. Evaluate or Monitor the Decision:
After implementation, look if the things are going the way they were planned. Whether the problem is resolved or there are some lapses. If the selected solution is unable to solve the problem then choose another alternative solution.

Pros and Cons of Decision Making Process


Decision making made in groups has following advantages:

1. Quality of Decision:
When so many people will be involved the quality of decision will improve.

2. Diversification:
There will be variety in the decision and complete understanding of the scenario.

3. Commitment:
When decisions are made in groups, the consent of other members is inclusive so they will be committed to the decision.

Disadvantages:

1. Time Consuming:
Group decision making is time consuming as it’s difficult to gather people on one place frequently. The process will take some time to complete.

2. Dominating Individuals:
The dominating individuals may influence the decision, so the dominating personalities are discouraged in group decision making.

3. No Coalitions:
There shouldn’t be groups within a group. The coalition should be discouraged in group decision making as a particular sub-group may influence the decision.

4. Criticism:
Criticism should be constructive and positive. The negative criticism should be deterred and the personal differences should be kept aside.